WiMAX360

Everything you need to know about WiMAX

Davor Virkes
  • Male
  • Croatia
Share 

Davor Virkes's Friends

Davor Virkes's Groups

 

Davor Virkes's Page

Latest Activity

Profile Information

Current Position
advisor
Areas of Expertise
National Telecom
Country of Residence
Croatia
Why are you interested in WiMAX?
Prepared it, tested it, rolledit out, and now trying to learn some lessons prior to burrial ceremony

Comment Wall (113 comments)

You need to be a member of WiMAX360 to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

At 8:21am on February 10, 2009, Andi said…
is it that simple? well i am fascinated
i have found a little clue about your point in a book (fundamental of wimax)
maybe i should try first.
Thank you by the way
At 3:51am on February 10, 2009, Davor Virkes said…
:lol: grossly :lol:

dB-s are representing powers and they are a log form of ratios. In case of dBm-s it is the ratio between a milliwatt ("m" in dBm) and a power in question, so the proper way of handling sums of signals is returning them back to their milliwatt form, add, and a sum is transformed to dBm-s again. There are some easy calculations, as if adding two identical signals - the result is +3dB of the starting value.

Usually only a strongest interferer counts, and the sum of all others is seldom even comparable to it.
At 9:56am on February 9, 2009, Andi said…
Greetings

First, I'm sorry to put this into your commentary section
Mr. Virkes, I'd like to ask you about WiMAX interference issue.

Right now I'm making System Level Simulation (SLS) for Mobile WiMAX. I kinda have some trouble in calculating interference from other user/BS.
You see that in SLS, we use multiple cell and assume multiple users occupied the entire network.

It turns out that interference is given by:
I = sum(EIRP - Pathloss - otherlosses) (dB)

If there are more than one user, say the I value in average is -100 dB, then if there are 3 users which emit -100dB interference power to the user of interest, then I = -300 dB.....is it true?

or i miscalculated it?

Thank you in advance for your attention and reply
At 6:08am on January 5, 2009, Davor Virkes said…
Unfortunately not. In fact, I did not need any fancy ASN in our system, just basic L2 connectivity, AAA and stuff. I am not completely illiterate here, but you better seek answers somewhere else ;)
At 1:54am on January 1, 2009, arvindkumar said…
Hi davor...can you share any document related to ASN dimensioning
At 4:20am on December 30, 2008, Davor Virkes said…
Thank you for your efforts, I'll contact you by mail.

I am rebuilding my home computer and without it all my old contacts are on floppies. Guess what - the new computer has no floppy drive :lol:

I added your contact to Skype, so we may meet there.
At 10:47pm on December 29, 2008, Monir Sarker said…
Dear Davor

I have met soem of them, can u plz give me your details info where u been with them and you cell no.

regards
MS
At 8:14am on December 16, 2008, Ali Saghaeian said…
Dear Davor,
Check the following link on “WiMAX Professional Seminar 2009, Tehran – Iran”
http://www.wimax360.com/forum/topics/wimax-professional-seminar
I’ll be glad to meet you there.

Best Regards,
Ali
At 6:37pm on December 9, 2008, Jimish A. Thakkar said…
Hey davor,
thanx a ton. This is a very useful information. thanks again.
JIMISH
At 5:35am on November 4, 2008, Davor Virkes said…
BTW did you notice importance of optimising antenna gain vs height and tilt against a covered distance?
There are optimum combinations of gain/height/tilt that provide you with almost constant signal strength and high C/I in a whole cell.
Think about it ;)
 
 

WiMAX360 Guidelines

Badge

Loading…
 

© 2009   Created by WiMAX Broadband Solutions

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service